As
the project continues I’ve realized a number of things in response to
my first post. The retention rate of participants in the workshop has
been 100% and are gaining from the strategies I have planned for them
throughout the course of the first four workshops. The structures I’ve
set up for discussions around the readings have worked both to promote
an inquiry based learning environment, and create opportunities for me
to be able to impart with them some of the craft strategies I find in
the works we are exploring. They don’t find them condescending at all,
and in fact prefer being read to aloud, and reading to each other aloud
as well. In terms of comprehension, participants are great at
synthesizing material and looking for ways that craft and content come
together.
The writing that participants have been submitting has been so full of
courage in that they are choosing to write about sensitive material.
While they do need support in terms of grammar and some structure, it is
evident that they are making choices in scene selection, dialogue, and
reflection based on discussions we’ve had during workshop, although
these too need more development. My only regret is that we only meet for
five weeks, and students have two opportunities to revise their final
pieces, with not much time to do intensive whole class workshopping the
second time around. In order to compensate for this with this group, I
am offering editing support beyond the workshop, with the goal of
getting their final pieces published. My goal with the next workshop is
to offer more sessions to do more writing and revising in class.
Rosa
Rosa